Saturday, October 20, 2012

BicycleVictoria Around the Bay in a Day Cycling Beach Road Bunch Cycling No Stopping Zones Cycling Participation Negligence Community Safety Cycling Safety Cycling Safely “Cyclists are much more likely to Die from Bicycle Alone Accidents/ Bike Falls and Riding on the Footpath onto the Road or Crossing than Dooring” Pete Dowe Cycling Deaths Fatalities Risk Reduction Informed Choice Inadequate Cycling Infrastructure Victoria's Cycling Strategy Focus on Increasing/ Encouraging Cycling Participation may be Negligent“ Cyclists who break the Law are much more likely to be killed or seriously injured” Bicycle Network Victoria "Young people are being killed riding off the footpath onto the road" Bicycle Network Victoria



"Our review of cycling deaths shows that cyclists who break the law are much more likely to be killed or seriously injured".  



Bicycle Victoria (2002)





"In over 60 per cent of (fatal) crashes, 



the cyclist was deemed to be ‘responsible’ for the



action that precipitated the fatal crash.” 



Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) 2006



“Cyclists who want motorists to share the road have got to do the same themselves. 



It really annoys us to see cyclists breaking the law as they are endangering themselves and others but also giving cyclists a bad name...” 



Bicycle Victoria/ Bicycle Network Victoria 

as previously stated on its website




Bicycle Network Victoria claims (based on a Danish mortality study*) that:
“The health benefits of cycling such as a more active lifestyle and better fitness far outweigh the risks of death or injury from crashes.” Bicycle Victoria’s Report into Cycle Deaths in Victoria (2002)

Bicycle Victoria’s ‘behaviour change’ ‘cycling participation’ advocacy, 

assumes a cavalier attitude to risk of death or injury.


I also believe this kind of “she’ll be right” cycling promotion 

is not only misleading but irresponsible 

by denying people an informed choice as to the risks and risk reduction measures

and therefore may be negligent 

and could have public and civil liability issues as well.




Pete Dowe

Road Safety Advocate

http://www.muggaccinos.com/Liability/BrakeCalcs/MyStuff/RegulateBunchRiding.htm



"We would not have the cyclists' behaviour problem on Beach Road or elsewhere in Victoria, 


if the emphasis on cycling promotion was on being law abiding, 


on having responsibilities, 


rather than 'participation' in road usage being the goal 


and the law being seen as optional."



Rooman (is that your real name?) states: http://petedoweroadsafetyadvocate.blogspot.com.au/2010/10/bicycle-victoria-around-bay-in-day.html

“Education starts in the road user’s head”

I agree. You must be fit to ride, before you ride for health and fitness

But Victoria Police advise in relation to traffic infringements that education does not work without enforcement.

Yet the Cycling community believe in education alone. That rogue cyclists will somehow self-regulate.
This has this never worked.

I argue that self-regulation is motivated by fear of detection and 

the likelihood of the law being enforced.

"Behaviour Change" cycling participation programs 

such as Around the Bay in a Day, Ride2Work and Ride2School

create inexperienced, careless, negligent and reckless rogue cycling.

Behaviour Change (what a misnomer)  

actually means simply ‘changing’ from one mode of transport to another 

i.e. stepping out of a car straight on to a bicycle and ‘participating’ in cycling.

Participation in cyclist road usage is not a worthwhile goal.

It ‘sets the bar too low’





http://petedoweroadsafetyadvocate.blogspot.com.au/2011/09/beachroadcyclingnostoppingzones.html



Behaviour modification is best addressed off-road, before people take up cycling.

We would not have the cyclists behaviour problem on Beach Road or elsewhere in Victoria, 

if the emphasis on cycling promotion was on being law abiding, 


on having responsibilities, 


rather than 'participation' in road usage being the goal 


and the law being seen as optional.

To reiterate, Victoria Police advise in relation to traffic infringements 

that education does not work without law enforcement.

Rooman also states: 

“the roads are for everyone who can accept the responsibility of being a road user.”
And what about those who don’t?

One road user group, the current Victorian Cycling community, 

has continually opposed law enforcement of cyclists, 

and law enforcement capability/ cyclists’ identification, 

as a disincentive to unsafe, illegitimate cycling.

So it should be!

Even with littering the www.litter.vic.gov.au website states: 

Enforcement and education play a primary role in improving these behaviours.”

Is negligent, reckless cycling less of a problem for the community than littering?


http://www.optuszoo.com.au/news/state/herald-sun/blitz-on-litter-louts-to-clean-up-state/897376


Is negligent, reckless cycling unworthy of law enforcement and education?

While at the same time the current Victorian Cycling community 

has called for increased penalties and enforcement 

upon every other road user group.

The issue is the people and the bicycle vehicle.

Opposing law enforcement, and law enforcement capability for cyclists, 

brings resentment and illegitimacy upon cyclists as a whole.

Furthermore it is a no-brainer.

“Cyclists who want motorists to share the road have got to do the same themselves. 

It really annoys us to see cyclists breaking the law as they are endangering themselves and others but also giving cyclists a bad name...” 


Bicycle Victoria/ Bicycle Network Victoria 
as previously stated on its website

Law enforcement is a cycling safety measure.

The fact is law-breaking cyclists mainly hurt themselves.

"Our review of cycling deaths shows that cyclists who break the law are much more likely to be killed or seriously injured".  

Bicycle Victoria (2002)

"In over 60 per cent of (fatal) crashes, 

the cyclist was deemed to be ‘responsible’ for the
action that precipitated the fatal crash.” 

Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) 2006

The erroneous common assumption that all cyclist deaths and serious injuries

are caused by motorist wrongdoing feeds a cyclist victim mentality.

Rather cyclists are victims of ‘cycling participation’/’behaviour change’ promotion.

Bicycle Network Victoria claims (based on a Danish mortality study*) that: 
“The health benefits of cycling such as a more active lifestyle and better fitness far outweigh the risks of death or injury from crashes.” 

Bicycle Victoria’s Report into Cycle Deaths in Victoria (2002)

Bicycle Victoria’s ‘behaviour change’ ‘cycling participation’ advocacy, 

assumes a cavalier attitude to risk of death or serious injury from road trauma.

I also believe this kind of “she’ll be right” cycling promotion 

is not only misleading but irresponsible 

by denying people an informed choice as to the risks and risk reduction measures

and therefore may be negligent 

and could have public and civil liability issues as well.



http://www.muggaccinos.com/Liability/BrakeCalcs/MyStuff/RegulateBunchRiding.htm


Pete Dowe

No comments:

Post a Comment